Last updated .

← Module 5 lessons
Secondary Math I · Module 5 · Systems of Equations and Inequalities

5.1 — Pet Sitters

Supplement for Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) curriculum · Secondary Math I, Module 5, Section 5.1
Independently created to support students using MVP Math. Not official publisher material and not affiliated with or endorsed by the Mathematics Vision Project.

Human review completed .

Represent limits on space and money, check possible pet counts, and justify a boarding plan.

1. In class: A Develop Understanding Task

In your MVP packetSection 5.1 · Main task · Pet-sitting planning question · p. 1

Represent the constraints

A constraint is a limit that a proposed choice must satisfy. Here the twins have limits on space and on the money available to buy pens and runs. Let x be the number of cats and y the number of dogs. The ordered pair \((x,y)\) records one possible boarding plan.

QuantityCatsDogsAvailable limit
Space per animal6 ft²24 ft²360 ft²
Pen/run purchase cost$32$80$1,280
Daily boarding income$8$20To be compared across plans

The two resource limits become:

\[6x+24y\le360\qquad\text{and}\qquad32x+80y\le1280\]

“Up to” includes the limit, so use \(\le\). The counts must also be nonnegative whole numbers. A system of inequalities is a collection of inequalities considered together; a solution must make all of them true.

Worked example 1 — Check the father’s suggestion

Original proposal: Board 12 cats and 12 dogs.

Worked solution: Substitute \(x=12\), \(y=12\) into both constraints:

CheckCalculationDoes it fit?
Space\(6(12)+24(12)=360\)Yes — exactly the available space.
Purchase cost\(32(12)+80(12)=1344\)No — $64 over the budget.

Meeting the space constraint alone is not enough. This plan cannot be funded with the $1,280 budget.

Worked example 2 — Compare plans that do fit

Sample alternatives: Compare an all-dog plan, an all-cat plan, and a mixed plan. These are examples of the kinds of choices the task asks you to investigate.

Plan (cats, dogs)SpacePurchase costDaily income
\((0,15)\)360 ft²$1,200$300
\((40,0)\)240 ft²$1,280$320
\((10,12)\)348 ft²$1,280$320

All three meet both resource limits. As in the packet, these income calculations assume all boarding spaces are filled. More dogs do not automatically mean more income: dogs also need more space and cost more to accommodate.

The boarding prices are exactly one quarter of the corresponding purchase costs. Therefore:

\[8x+20y=\frac14(32x+80y)\le\frac14(1280)=320\]

No affordable plan can bring in more than $320 per day. The mixed plan \((10,12)\) reaches that limit, so it is a valid best recommendation. It is not the only one: for example, \((20,8)\) also meets both constraints and earns $320 per day.

When giving your recommendation, state the counts, check both constraints, calculate the daily income, and explain why your choice is reasonable.

2. Ready — Graph linear systems

In your MVP packetSection 5.1 · Ready · Problems 1–4 · p. 2

For a refresher, see Section 3.2’s graphing examples. A solution is a point on both lines. Try the graphs before opening the key.

Check your work — Ready 1–4 answer key

Plots are not shown. These are the points of intersection.

  1. (c) \((1,1)\)

  2. (a) \((2,7)\)

  3. \((0,3)\)

  4. \((2,-2)\)

3. Set — Combinations and packing

In your MVP packetSection 5.1 · Set · Problems 5–7 · p. 3

Try finding your own combinations first. Check every condition, not just one. The key gives sample answers; many other answers are possible.

Check your work — Set 5–7 answer key

5 — Theater tickets

Let c be child tickets and a adult tickets. The conditions are \(5c+10a\ge2000\) and \(c+a\le350\), with whole-number counts.

Child ticketsAdult ticketsTotal seats
50175225
100150250
150125275
200100300
30050350

Each sample brings in exactly $2,000 and uses no more than 350 seats.

6 — Basketball points

Each row totals 102 points: three times the first count, twice the second, plus the free throws.

3-point shots2-point shotsFree throws
102032
121830
141628
161426
181224

7 — Fill the 12 × 12 grid

There are many possible solutions. The packing below is one example; other arrangements that fill the grid without gaps or overlaps are also valid.

One complete packing: 36e, with zero of a, b, c, and d. Shape e is a 2 × 2 square. Place six squares across each row of blocks and six rows of blocks down the grid.

This covers all \(12\times12=144\) unit squares, so no packing can cover more. Every supplied piece has area 4; \(36\times4=144\). The layout is not drawn here.

4. Go — Line graphs and arithmetic sequences

In your MVP packetSection 5.1 · Go · Problems 8–16 · pp. 4–5

This reviews line graphing and arithmetic sequences. For help with sequence rules, see Section 3.2. Try the exercises before checking the key.

Check your work — Go 8–16 answer key

8–11 — Test the point and find two other points

Plots are not shown. The sample points below are different from (3,5).

ProblemIs (3,5) a solution?Two other points
8Yes\((0,-1)\) and \((4,7)\)
9No\((-9,-1)\) and \((9,5)\)
10No\((-1,8)\) and \((4,-7)\)
11No\((-5,7)\) and \((10,-2)\)

12

Values in order: 17, 9, 1, −7

Explicit rule: \(y=25-8x\)

13

Values in order: 17, 15, 13, 11, 9, 7, 5, 3, 1, −1, −3, −5, −7

Explicit rule: \(y=19-2x\)

14

Values in order: 17, 13, 9, 5, 1, −3, −7

Explicit rule: \(y=21-4x\)

15

No. The changes per term are −8, −2, and −4, so the points lie on lines with different slopes. The last value −7 occurs at different inputs: 4, 13, and 7.

16

\((1,17)\)

All three sequences begin at that same point.

Additional learning resources

ResourceWhat it supports
Khan Academy — Writing two-variable inequalities word problemUses a chess-score example to translate a situation into an inequality involving two quantities.

Teacher’s review of the source packet

No substantial mathematical or instructional issues were identified. The main task allows several equally good boarding plans; the supplement gives examples rather than a unique required recommendation.

Coverage

Packet componentWhere supported
Main task · p. 1Constraint definitions, both resource models, checked proposals, and a maximum-income argument.
Ready 1–4 · p. 2Linked graphing review and intersection answers; plots omitted.
Set 5–7 · p. 3Five ticket combinations, five scoring combinations, and one complete packing.
Go 8–16 · pp. 4–5Point tests, sample graphing points, sequence values/rules, and explained comparisons.

Data and prompts adapted from Mathematics Vision Project, Secondary Mathematics I, Module 5 student packet, Section 5.1, printed pp. 1–5, under CC BY 4.0. Explanations, solutions, and any diagrams were prepared for this supplement.

Last updated .