Last updated .

← All Module 5 lessons
Secondary Math II · Module 5 · Geometric Figures

5.6 — Justification and Proof

Supplement for Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) curriculum · Secondary Math II, Module 5, Section 5.6
Independently created to support students using MVP Math. Not official publisher material and not affiliated with or endorsed by the Mathematics Vision Project.

Today's goal. Turn conjectures into justified proofs: vertical angles, exterior angles of triangles, and angles formed by parallel lines and a transversal. Then use rigid-motion facts, angle relationships, and triangle congruence in Ready and Set. In Go, translate absolute-value graphs into equations and piecewise definitions.

In Section 5.5 you identified angle patterns and made conjectures. Today you will explain why those claims must hold. A convincing proof does not depend on how accurate the picture looks; it proceeds from given facts, definitions, and previously established properties.

1. In class: A Practice Understanding Task

From a conjecture to a proof

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38

A proof is a chain of statements in which every important claim has a reason. Start by identifying what is given, what you must prove, and which previously known relationships connect them. Section 5.3 introduced narrative, flow, and two-column formats; all three can express the same reasoning.

A useful proof routine

Mark the given information; name the target claim; use definitions and previously established facts; state the conclusion only after the necessary intermediate steps. Reasons might be “given,” “linear-pair angles sum to 180°,” “triangle angle sum,” “translation preserves angles,” or “vertical angles are congruent” after that fact is proven.

Worked example 1 — A tiny two-column proof

Given: ∠A and ∠B are supplementary and have equal measures. Prove: both measure 90°.

StatementReason
\(m\angle A+m\angle B=180^\circ\)Definition of supplementary angles
\(m\angle A=m\angle B\)Given
\(2m\angle A=180^\circ\)Substitution
\(m\angle A=m\angle B=90^\circ\)Divide by 2 and use equality

Prove that vertical angles are congruent (main task 1)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38

When two lines intersect, opposite angles are vertical angles. An angle next to either vertical angle makes a linear pair with it. The key is that the two vertical angles are both supplements of the same adjacent angle.

ABCDE
At E, the opposite angles ∠AEB and ∠CED are vertical angles.
Worked example 2 — Proof of vertical angles (packet task 1)

Given: \(\overleftrightarrow{AC}\) and \(\overleftrightarrow{BD}\) intersect at E (the diagram labels have been arranged so both pairs of opposite rays lie on straight lines). Prove: \(\angle AEB\cong\angle CED\).

Both ∠AEB and ∠CED are supplementary to ∠BEC because they each form a linear pair with ∠BEC.

\[m\angle AEB+m\angle BEC=180^\circ,\]\[m\angle CED+m\angle BEC=180^\circ.\]

Subtract the shared \(m\angle BEC\) from both equations:

\[\boxed{m\angle AEB=m\angle CED}.\]

Angles with equal measures are congruent.

Diagram convention — Section 5.6, task 1Trust the intersection and opposite rays, not their particular letter positions.

Our reconstructed diagram uses points A, E, C on one line and B, E, D on the other. The opposite-angle relationship is the essential given fact.

Prove the Exterior Angle Theorem (main task 2)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38

Extend one side of a triangle. The exterior angle and the adjacent interior angle form a linear pair. Meanwhile, the three interior angles of the triangle total 180°.

1234ABC
Interior angles 1, 2, 3 belong to the triangle; angle 4 is exterior and adjacent to 3.
Worked example 3 — Proof (packet task 2)

Given: angle 4 is exterior to a triangle. Prove: \(m\angle4=m\angle1+m\angle2\).

StatementReason
\(m\angle1+m\angle2+m\angle3=180^\circ\)Triangle interior-angle sum
\(m\angle3+m\angle4=180^\circ\)Angles 3 and 4 form a linear pair
\(m\angle1+m\angle2+m\angle3=m\angle3+m\angle4\)Both expressions equal 180°
\(\boxed{m\angle4=m\angle1+m\angle2}\)Subtract \(m\angle3\)

The two remote interior angles add to the exterior angle. The adjacent interior angle is not one of the remote angles.

Prove angle relationships for parallel lines (main tasks 3–5)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38

Let two horizontal lines be parallel and let a diagonal transversal cross them. The numbered positions below match the packet's principal relationships: corresponding 1 and 5, alternate interior 3 and 6, and same-side interior 3 and 5.

12345678ℓmt
The parallel lines ℓ and m are crossed by transversal t. Labels identify angle positions, not measured angle sizes.

Corresponding angles (packet task 3)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38

Claim: angles 1 and 5 are congruent when the lines are parallel.

Worked example 4 — Translation argument

Move the first intersection to the second by a translation along the transversal. Because the transversal passes through both intersection points, that translation carries the transversal onto itself. It also carries the top line onto the unique parallel line through the second intersection: the bottom line. A translation preserves angle measure, so the angle in position 1 lands on the angle in matching position 5.

\[\boxed{\angle1\cong\angle5.}\]

This is a rigid-motion justification, not a claim based on appearance.

Alternate interior angles (packet task 4)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38
Worked example 5 — Chain of two proven results

To prove the alternate interior pair 3 and 6, connect two earlier results:

Angles 3 and 2 are vertical, so \(m\angle3=m\angle2\). Angles 2 and 6 are corresponding, so \(m\angle2=m\angle6\).

\[\boxed{m\angle3=m\angle6}.\]

Same-side interior angles (packet task 5)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38
Worked example 6 — Supplementary, not congruent

Angles 3 and 6 are alternate interior and therefore congruent. Angles 5 and 6 form a linear pair at the lower crossing, so their measures sum to 180°. Substituting the equal measures gives

\[m\angle5+m\angle6=180^\circ\]\[\boxed{m\angle5+m\angle3=180^\circ}.\]

Therefore angles 3 and 5 are supplementary.

Reverse the implication: the converse (main task 6)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Main task · Problems 1–6 · pp. 35–38

So far we assumed two lines were parallel and deduced equal angle measures. The converse reverses the condition and conclusion: if a transversal makes equal alternate interior angles, the two lines must be parallel.

Worked example 7 — Proof of the converse

Given: \(\angle3\cong\angle6\). Prove: \(\ell\parallel m\).

Suppose instead that a line \(m'\) through the lower intersection is drawn parallel to \(\ell\). The proved alternate-interior-angle property would make the matching angle on \(m'\) congruent to angle 3. By the given, the matching angle on the actual line \(m\) is also congruent to angle 3. Through a fixed point, there is only one ray on the indicated side of a transversal making a specified angle with it. Thus \(m=m'\); consequently \(\boxed{\ell\parallel m}\).

Key distinction: this argument relies on the uniqueness of a ray forming a given angle and the existence of a parallel through a point; simply reversing the earlier proof is not a valid logical step without a reason.

Warning about correspondence: in the diagram used here, the opposite-angle pairs are (1,4) and (2,3). These are the pairs to use when citing vertical angles. A diagram's numbers cannot be rearranged casually without changing which proof steps apply.

2. Ready — Recall rigid motions (problems 1–4)

Study the worked examples first, then try the problems yourself. An answer key at the bottom of this section is provided to check your work.

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Ready · Problems 1–4 · p. 39

A rigid motion preserves distances and angles. All translations, reflections, and rotations are rigid motions, though their descriptions of corresponding points differ.

MotionWhat happens to corresponding points?Why?
TranslationThe segment joining each point to its image has the same length and is parallel to every other such joining segment (unless the displacement is zero).Every point moves by the same vector.
ReflectionThe reflecting line is the perpendicular bisector of a segment joining a point to its distinct image.Mirror points are equally distant from the mirror line on opposite sides.
RotationA point and its image are the same distance from the rotation center.The rotation moves each point along a circle centered at the rotation point.
Any rigid motionLengths and angle measures remain equal.Rigid motions are distance-preserving isometries.
Worked example 8 — Why the translation segments agree

Translate by the vector \(\langle 3,-2\rangle\). The point \((1,4)\) moves to \((4,2)\), while \((-2,1)\) moves to \((1,-1)\). Each joining vector is \(\langle3,-2\rangle\), so each segment has length \(\sqrt{3^2+(-2)^2}=\sqrt{13}\) and the same direction.

Special cases: a point on a reflection axis stays in place; the zero translation gives zero-length joining segments. These degenerate cases do not change the central rule for distinct point-image pairs.

Check your work — Ready 1–4 answer key
  1. Parallel and congruent, because every point moves through the same displacement vector.
  2. Perpendicular bisector, because corresponding points lie at equal perpendicular distances on opposite sides of the mirror line.
  3. Distance, because rotation preserves the radius from the fixed center.
  4. They preserve distances and angle measures, so the image is congruent to the pre-image.

3. Set — Solve angles and prove congruent triangles (problems 5–10)

Study the worked examples first, then try the problems yourself. An answer key at the bottom of this section is provided to check your work.

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Set · Problems 5–10 · pp. 39–40

Missing angles (problems 5–8)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Set · Problems 5–10 · pp. 39–40

First mark what is given: triangle angle sum, linear pair, vertical angles, or parallel-line relationships. Decide whether the unknown is adjacent to, opposite from, or located at a different intersection than the known angle.

Worked example 9 — Packet problem 5

The triangle has two interior angles 23° and 85°. Its exterior angle x at the remaining vertex is the sum of the remote interior angles:

\[x=23^\circ+85^\circ=\boxed{108^\circ}.\]

The adjacent interior angle is 72°; check that 72° + 108° = 180°.

Worked example 10 — Packet problem 6

The exterior angle at the right is 135° and one remote interior angle is 87°. Therefore

\[135^\circ=x+87^\circ\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\boxed{x=48^\circ}.\]
Worked example 11 — Packet problem 7

Two marked lines are parallel and crossed by a transversal. The displayed 115° angle is supplementary to the corresponding acute angle. The angle x is the acute angle in the relevant matching position:

\[x=180^\circ-115^\circ=\boxed{65^\circ}.\]
Worked example 12 — Packet problem 8

The two marked lines are parallel; the marked 75° angle and the angle labeled \((2x+7)^\circ\) are alternate exterior angles in the displayed arrangement, so they agree:

\[2x+7=75\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\boxed{x=34}.\]

Triangle-congruence proofs (problems 9–10)

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Set · Problems 5–10 · pp. 39–40

A valid SAS proof uses two corresponding sides and the angle between them. A valid AAS proof uses two corresponding angles and a side not between them. Make sure the vertex order matches the required correspondence.

VWXZY
Packet Set 9: Y is the common midpoint of VZ and XW, so the intersecting segments are bisected.
Worked example 13 — Packet problem 9, SAS

Given: Y is the midpoint of \(\overline{VZ}\) and \(\overline{XW}\). Prove: \(\triangle VYW\cong\triangle ZYX\).

StatementReason
Y is midpoint of \(\overline{VZ}\) and \(\overline{XW}\)Given
\(\overline{VY}\cong\overline{YZ}\) and \(\overline{YW}\cong\overline{YX}\)Definition of midpoint
\(\angle VYW\cong\angle ZYX\)Vertical angles are congruent
\(\boxed{\triangle VYW\cong\triangle ZYX}\)SAS
RSTUV
Packet Set 10: use the given angle congruence, given segment congruence, and vertical angles at T.
Worked example 14 — Packet problem 10, AAS

Given: \(\angle R\cong\angle U\) and \(\overline{ST}\cong\overline{VT}\). Prove: \(\triangle SRT\cong\triangle VUT\).

StatementReason
\(\angle SRT\cong\angle VUT\)Given
\(\overline{ST}\cong\overline{VT}\)Given
\(\angle STR\cong\angle VTU\)Vertical angles are congruent
\(\boxed{\triangle SRT\cong\triangle VUT}\)AAS (angles R ↔ U and T ↔ T; sides ST ↔ VT)

Do not substitute SSA for AAS: the second angle at T is essential to the argument.

Check your work — Set 5–10 answer key
  1. \(x=108^\circ\), the sum of the two remote interior angles.
  2. \(x=48\), since \(x+87=135\).
  3. \(x=65\), since the corresponding angle adjacent to \(115^\circ\) is its supplement.
  4. \(x=34\), since the alternate exterior angles give \(2x+7=75\).
  5. Y is the midpoint of VZ and XW (given), so \(VY=YZ\) and \(WY=YX\). Also \(\angle VYW\cong\angle ZYX\) (vertical angles). Thus \(\triangle VYW\cong\triangle ZYX\) by SAS.
  6. \(\angle SRT\cong\angle VUT\) and \(ST=VT\) (given). The vertical angles \(\angle RTS\cong\angle UTV\); therefore the remaining angles \(\angle RST\cong\angle UVT\) by the triangle angle sum. With included side \(ST=VT\), ASA gives \(\triangle SRT\cong\triangle VUT\).

4. Go — Absolute value as a piecewise function (problems 15–18)

Study the worked examples first, then try the problems yourself. An answer key at the bottom of this section is provided to check your work.

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Go · Problems 15–18 · p. 41

This separate algebra review is part of the assigned homework. The graph of \(y=a|x-h|+k\) has vertex \((h,k)\). Each straight arm has a constant slope; for upward-opening V graphs, \(a>0\). Use the graph's vertex and a second point to determine a, then rewrite the absolute value using two cases.

Absolute value and piecewise definitions\[|u|=\begin{cases}-u,&u<0,\\u,&u\ge 0.\end{cases}\]\[\boxed{a|x-h|+k=\begin{cases}-a(x-h)+k,&x<h,\\a(x-h)+k,&x\ge h.\end{cases}}\]

At \(x=h\), either branch gives the same vertex height k. Assign the equality to just one branch to make the cases nonoverlapping.

-3-1135-11357(1,2)
Exactly plotted model: vertex (1, 2), arm slopes ±1.
Worked example 15 — Packet Go 15

The graph's vertex is (1,2) and both arms have slope magnitude 1. Thus

\[\boxed{y=|x-1|+2}.\]\[y=\begin{cases}-x+3,&x<1,\\x+1,&x\ge1.\end{cases}\]

Check: at x=1 both expressions equal 2.

-3-113-1135(0,2)
Exactly plotted model: vertex (0, 2), arm slopes ±1.
Worked example 16 — Packet Go 16\[\boxed{y=|x|+2}\]\[y=\begin{cases}-x+2,&x<0,\\x+2,&x\ge0.\end{cases}\]
-10-8-6-4-2024-11357(-3,0)
Exactly plotted model: vertex (-3, 0), arm slopes ±1.
Worked example 17 — Packet Go 17

The vertex is (−3,0). In particular, y=3 at x=0, which confirms a slope magnitude of 1.

\[\boxed{y=|x+3|}\]\[y=\begin{cases}-x-3,&x<-3,\\x+3,&x\ge-3.\end{cases}\]
-12-10-8-6-4-202-5-3-113(-5,-4)
Exactly plotted model: vertex (-5, -4), arm slopes ±1.
Worked example 18 — Packet Go 18

The vertex is (−5,−4). A second point on the right arm is (−1,0), so \(a=(0+4)/(-1+5)=1\).

\[\boxed{y=|x+5|-4}\]\[y=\begin{cases}-x-9,&x<-5,\\x+1,&x\ge-5.\end{cases}\]

Additional fully worked Go practice

In your MVP packetSection 5.6 · Go · Problems 15–18 · p. 41
Problem A — Straightforward

Convert \(y=|x-4|+1\) to a piecewise function.

When \(x<4\), \(|x-4|=4-x\); when \(x\ge4\), \(|x-4|=x-4\). Therefore

\[\boxed{y=\begin{cases}-x+5,&x<4,\\x-3,&x\ge4.\end{cases}}\]
Problem B — More challenging

An upward V graph has vertex (−2,3) and passes through (0,9). Write its absolute-value and piecewise equations.

Start with \(y=a|x+2|+3\). Substitute (0,9): \(9=2a+3\), so \(a=3\).

\[\boxed{y=3|x+2|+3}\]\[\boxed{y=\begin{cases}-3x-3,&x<-2,\\3x+9,&x\ge-2.\end{cases}}\]

Check the left branch at −2: \(6-3=3\). The right branch gives \(-6+9=3\), so the branches meet at the given vertex.

Problem C — Piecewise-to-absolute-value reverse

Find one absolute-value expression for \(f(x)=\begin{cases}-2x-2,&x<-1,\\2x+2,&x\ge-1.\end{cases}\)

Both branches meet at (−1,0), and their slopes have magnitude 2. Thus \(\boxed{f(x)=2|x+1|}\).

Two common mistakes: the vertex x-coordinate h is the number that makes the expression inside the absolute value zero (so \(|x+3|\) has h=−3). Also, the left branch must have the correct sign: for \(a>0\) it slopes downward as x increases toward the vertex.
Check your work — Go 15–18 answer key

The source numbering jumps from 10 to 15; no homework exercises 11–14 are printed.

  1. (A) \(y=|x-1|+2\). (B) \(y=\begin{cases}-x+3,&x<1\\x+1,&x\ge1.\end{cases}\)
  2. (A) \(y=|x|+2\). (B) \(y=\begin{cases}-x+2,&x<0\\x+2,&x\ge0.\end{cases}\)
  3. (A) \(y=|x+3|\). (B) \(y=\begin{cases}-x-3,&x<-3\\x+3,&x\ge-3.\end{cases}\)
  4. (A) \(y=|x+5|-4\). (B) \(y=\begin{cases}-x-9,&x<-5\\x+1,&x\ge-5.\end{cases}\)

5. Additional Learning Resources

Use these targeted resources after working through the explanations above. Each recommendation matches a particular part of today's assignment.

Resource and direct linkWhat it teachesScope / What to skip
Khan Academy — Vertical angles practiceIdentify and use vertical angles after the proof in §2.Close match. A short reinforcement exercise.
Khan Academy — Proving angles are congruent (video)Follow a geometric proof using triangle-angle and parallel-line facts.Close match. Focus on the reasoning chain rather than the particular labels.
Khan Academy — Angle relationships with parallel linesPractice identifying corresponding, alternate, and supplementary angles.Close match. Useful for task 3–6 and Set 5–8.
Khan Academy — Graphing absolute value functions (video)Read the vertex and slopes of the V-shaped graph.Some extra material. Watch for graph-to-equation skills; solving absolute-value inequalities is not needed.
Khan Academy — Introduction to piecewise functions (video)Understand how the domain is split into two rules, as in Go 15–18.Some extra material. Concentrate on interval conditions; other kinds of piecewise functions are optional review.

Professor Leonard was searched for a directly relevant lesson; no sufficiently close lecture was confirmed, so none is assigned. MathJax formatting requires an internet connection.

6. Teacher's review (teachers and parents)

No serious mathematical errors or omissions were identified in Section 5.6. The diagrams in main tasks 3–6 should be read together with their stated givens; apparent parallelism by itself is never a sufficient justification.

7. Section 5.6 coverage

Packet sectionWhere taught
Main task 1: vertical-angle proofIn class
Main task 2: exterior-angle theorem proofIn class
Main task 3: corresponding anglesIn class
Main task 4: alternate interior anglesIn class
Main task 5: same-side interior anglesIn class
Main task 6: converse alternate interior anglesIn class
Ready 1–4: transformation featuresSection 2
Set 5–8: angle relationshipsSection 3
Set 9–10: congruence proofsSection 3
Go 15–18: absolute-value/piecewise formsSection 4 plus three new problems

Independent instructional companion to Mathematics Vision Project, Secondary Mathematics II, Module 5: Geometric Figures (2017), Section 5.6. Geometry and graph coordinates were mathematically constrained; graphics require no network. MathJax equation typesetting requires an internet connection.

Last updated .