Last updated .

← All Module 6 lessons
Secondary Math II · Module 6 · Similarity & Right Triangle Trigonometry

6.4 — Cut by a Transversal

Supplement for Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) curriculum · Secondary Math II, Module 6, Section 6.4
Independently created to support students using MVP Math. Not official publisher material and not affiliated with or endorsed by the Mathematics Vision Project.

What you will learn. Explain why parallel lines create similar triangles; set up corresponding side ratios; prove why segments between parallel lines are proportional; and solve for missing lengths. Review the Pythagorean theorem, label similar triangles, and show why slope is the same using different-sized triangles.

1. In class: A Solidify Understanding Task

Parallel lines make similar triangles

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Main task · p. 20 · Problems 1–3
Use two transversals and several parallel lines to make three triangles and compare corresponding sides.

A transversal is a line that crosses other lines. Start with two transversals meeting at a point called \(A\), and draw horizontal lines across them. Each horizontal line makes a triangle with vertex \(A\).

Take one of these triangles, \(\triangle ABC\). A second horizontal segment \(DE\) is parallel to its base \(BC\), and points \(D\) and \(E\) lie on the same two rays from \(A\). The triangles share angle \(A\). Because \(BC\parallel DE\), the corresponding angles where the transversals meet these bases are equal. Thus two pairs of angles match, so the triangles are similar by AA similarity (angle-angle).

ABCDEFG
Original instructional diagram. The segments \(BC\), \(DE\), and \(FG\) are parallel, and both slanted transversals meet at \(A\). The three triangles are \(\triangle ABC\), \(\triangle ADE\), and \(\triangle AFG\).
Correspondence is the key. When \(BC\parallel DE\parallel FG\): \[\triangle ABC\sim\triangle ADE\sim\triangle AFG.\] The vertex order says \(A\leftrightarrow A\), \(B\leftrightarrow D\leftrightarrow F\), and \(C\leftrightarrow E\leftrightarrow G\). Therefore \[\frac{AB}{AD}=\frac{AC}{AE}=\frac{BC}{DE}\qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{AB}{AF}=\frac{AC}{AG}=\frac{BC}{FG}.\]

You can also compare the middle and largest triangles: \(\frac{AD}{AF}=\frac{AE}{AG}=\frac{DE}{FG}\). There are many correct proportions, but each one must pair corresponding segments in the same order.

Worked example 1 — Three related triangles.

For a separate numerical example (not measurements of the diagram above), suppose \(BC\parallel DE\), \(AB=6\), \(AD=9\), \(AC=8\), and \(BC=10\). Find \(AE\) and \(DE\).

First find the scale factor from the smaller to the larger triangle: \(\frac{AD}{AB}=\frac96=\frac32\).

\[AE=AC\cdot\frac32=8\cdot\frac32=12.\] \[DE=BC\cdot\frac32=10\cdot\frac32=15.\]

Check: \(6/9=8/12=10/15=2/3\). All three corresponding side ratios agree.

Do not mix a part with a whole. \(BD\) is the portion from \(B\) to \(D\), while \(AD\) is the whole distance from \(A\) to \(D\). They are different quantities: \(AD=AB+BD\).

Segments between the parallel lines are proportional, too

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Main task · p. 21 · Problems 4–6 and final algebraic proof
Test Tristan’s proportion, then derive it from a pair of similar triangles rather than relying on measurement alone.

Similarity initially gives ratios of whole triangle sides. We can use those ratios to compare just the portions of the transversals between two parallel lines.

ABCDEFG
Original instructional diagram. The orange segments \(BD\) and \(CE\) lie between the same two parallel lines. Each is a piece of one of the larger triangle’s sides.
Transversal proportionality. In the figure, the two segments between \(BC\) and \(DE\) satisfy \[\boxed{\frac{BD}{AB}=\frac{CE}{AC}}.\] More generally, when several parallel lines cross two transversals, corresponding portions cut from the two transversals have the same ratio. For instance, \[\frac{BD}{DF}=\frac{CE}{EG}.\]
Worked example 2 — Numerical check of Tristan’s claim.

Consider a separate original set of possible lengths (not measured from the figure): \(AB=10\), \(AC=8\), \(AD=15\), and \(AE=12\).

Subtract to find the pieces between the horizontal lines:

\[BD=AD-AB=15-10=5,\qquad CE=AE-AC=12-8=4.\]

Compare each piece to the portion above it:

\[\frac{BD}{AB}=\frac5{10}=\frac12,\qquad \frac{CE}{AC}=\frac48=\frac12.\]

The equality works for these numbers. But a single numerical check is not a proof for every possible diagram.

Why this relationship always works

The small and large triangles are similar, so \(\frac{AD}{AB}=\frac{AE}{AC}\). Since \(AD=AB+BD\) and \(AE=AC+CE\), substitute:

Worked example 3 — Algebraic proof. \[\begin{aligned} \frac{AD}{AB}&=\frac{AE}{AC}\\[5pt] \frac{AB+BD}{AB}&=\frac{AC+CE}{AC}\\[5pt] \frac{AB}{AB}+\frac{BD}{AB}&=\frac{AC}{AC}+\frac{CE}{AC}\\[5pt] 1+\frac{BD}{AB}&=1+\frac{CE}{AC}\\[5pt] \frac{BD}{AB}&=\frac{CE}{AC}. \end{aligned}\]

We subtracted 1 from both sides in the final step. The proof does not need measured lengths; it relies only on triangle similarity and segment addition.

Apply the same reasoning to the triangles \(\triangle ADE\) and \(\triangle AFG\). Because all three are similar, the ratio of left-side to right-side whole lengths is a constant \(k=AB/AC=AD/AE=AF/AG\). Subtract corresponding whole lengths:

\[BD=AD-AB=k(AE-AC)=k\,CE,\]\[DF=AF-AD=k(AG-AE)=k\,EG.\]

Dividing these equations gives \(\frac{BD}{DF}=\frac{CE}{EG}\), provided the denominators are nonzero. This is why any two adjacent strips cut from parallel lines share the same ratio.

Packet clarification — Main task, problems 1–3 and 4–6 (pp. 20–21).

To reproduce the picture with ordinary nested triangles, choose parallel lines on the same side of \(A\), and do not use a line through \(A\) as a triangle base. Measurements from a hand-drawn sketch may differ slightly from exact ratios; the equalities follow from the parallel-line assumption, not measurement precision. In problem 4, Tristan writes \(\frac{BD}{AB}=\frac{CE}{AC}\): the numerator segments need not themselves be full sides of a triangle.

2. Ready review — Pythagorean theorem and similar right triangles

Study the worked examples first, then try the problems yourself. An answer key at the bottom of this section is provided to check your work.

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Ready · p. 22 · Problems 1–6
Use the Pythagorean theorem for missing sides (1–4), then create and solve proportions for similar right triangles (5–6).

In a right triangle, the hypotenuse is the side opposite the right angle and is always the longest. If the legs are \(a,b\) and the hypotenuse is \(c\), then

\[a^2+b^2=c^2.\]

If the unknown is the hypotenuse, add the squares. If the unknown is a leg, subtract the square of the other leg from the hypotenuse’s square.

Worked example 4 — Find a hypotenuse.

The legs of a right triangle are 9 and 12. Find the hypotenuse.

\[\begin{aligned}c^2&=9^2+12^2=81+144=225\\c&=\sqrt{225}=15.\end{aligned}\]

We take the positive square root because length cannot be negative.

Worked example 5 — Find a leg with a radical.

A right triangle has hypotenuse \(\sqrt{37}\) and one leg 6. Find the other leg, \(x\).

\[\begin{aligned}x^2+6^2&=(\sqrt{37})^2\\x^2+36&=37\\x^2&=1\\x&=1.\end{aligned}\]

Unlike a leg, the hypotenuse cannot be shorter than the other sides. Before solving, identify the side opposite the square corner in the packet diagram.

When two right triangles are known to be similar, corresponding legs and hypotenuses have the same scale factor. Match sides by their positions relative to the right angle, not by whether they appear horizontal or vertical.

Worked example 6 — A similar-right-triangle proportion.

A small right triangle has a leg of 5 and a hypotenuse of 13. A similar larger right triangle has the corresponding leg of 15. Find its hypotenuse, \(x\).

\[\frac{5}{15}=\frac{13}{x}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad 5x=15(13)\quad\Longrightarrow\quad x=39.\]

Check using the scale factor: \(15/5=3\), so the hypotenuse also becomes \(13\cdot3=39\).

Check your work — Ready 1–6 answer key
  1. \(13\).
  2. \(1\).
  3. \(\sqrt{15}\).
  4. \(3\).
  5. \(\frac c{\sqrt{29}}=\frac{15}{5}\), so \(c=3\sqrt{29}\).
  6. \(\frac{x}{12}=\frac{26}{13}\), so the missing leg is \(24\).

3. Set — Write and solve proportions for parallel transversals

Study the worked examples first, then try the problems yourself. An answer key at the bottom of this section is provided to check your work.

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Set · p. 23 · Problems 7–10
Write three equal ratios from matching parts (7–8) and solve missing-length proportions (9–10).

First mark each pair of corresponding segments—the stretches lying between the same two parallel lines. Ratios only remain valid when the top, middle, and bottom points are paired consistently.

For the nested triangles in the In class section, three valid whole-side ratios are

\[\boxed{\frac{AB}{AD}=\frac{AC}{AE}=\frac{BC}{DE}}.\]

With three parallel levels and two transversals, you can also compare the two consecutive gaps: \(BD/DF=CE/EG\). This remains true if the transversals intersect outside the region shown: the intercept theorem depends on the parallel lines, not on the point of intersection being visible.

Two useful arrangements of three equal ratios

In Set problem 7, the upper transversal has consecutive segments named \(a\) and \(b\), and the lower has matching consecutive segments \(d\) and \(c\). One useful set of three equal ratios is

\[\boxed{\frac{a}{d}=\frac{b}{c}=\frac{a+b}{d+c}}.\]

The third fraction compares the combined lengths, not an additional small segment. For instance, if \(a=4,\ b=6,\ d=3,\ c=4.5\), all three fractions equal \(\tfrac43\).

In Set problem 8, the two transversals meet at \(B\) below three parallel horizontal lines. Here the three equal ratios may instead compare the full distances from \(B\) to the three parallel levels:

\[\boxed{\frac{BA}{BC}=\frac{BF}{BD}=\frac{BG}{BE}}.\]

Other equivalent proportions are possible. For both arrangements, confirm which points lie on each transversal and pair corresponding positions carefully.

Worked example 7 — Three equal ratios.

Suppose \(AB=4\), \(AD=10\), \(AC=5\), and \(BC=6\), where \(BC\parallel DE\). The larger triangle is \(10/4=2.5\) times as large.

Consequently \(AE=5(2.5)=12.5\) and \(DE=6(2.5)=15\). Three equal ratios are

\[\frac{AB}{AD}=\frac{AC}{AE}=\frac{BC}{DE}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\frac4{10}=\frac5{12.5}=\frac6{15}.\]

For missing lengths, decide whether the labels represent full lengths measured from the apex or the short segments lying between two parallel lines. Do not plug a complete side into a proportion intended for a short segment.

ABCDE
Original worked-example construction. \(BC\parallel DE\). The first horizontal segment is 4 units below \(A\), and the second is 10 units below \(A\). By construction \(AB=4\), \(AC=5\), \(BD=6\), and \(CE=7.5\).
Worked example 8 — The unknown lies between the parallel lines.

In the figure above, \(AB=4\), \(AC=5\), \(BD=6\), and \(CE=x\). Use the ratio of two corresponding parts:

\[\frac{BD}{AB}=\frac{CE}{AC}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\frac64=\frac{x}{5}.\]

Cross-multiply: \(4x=30\), so \(\boxed{x=7.5}\).

Alternatively, \(AD=4+6=10\), so similarity gives \(AE/AC=AD/AB=10/4\); \(AE=12.5\), and \(CE=AE-AC=12.5-5=7.5\).

Worked example 9 — Compare two consecutive strips.

Three parallel lines cross two transversals. Between lines 1 and 2 the left segment is 2 and the right is 3. Between lines 2 and 3 the left segment is \(x\) and the right is 9. Find \(x\).

\[\frac{2}{x}=\frac{3}{9}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad 3x=18\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\boxed{x=6}.\]

Both fractions compare the upper strip to the lower strip. A common mistake is to flip one fraction but not the other.

Check your work — Set 7–14 answer key
  1. Assuming the three nearly vertical lines are parallel, \(\frac ad=\frac bc=\frac{a+b}{c+d}\). Parallelism is suggested but not marked; these equalities need that given.
  2. \(\frac{BA}{BC}=\frac{BF}{BD}=\frac{BG}{BE}\), since the three cross-segments are marked parallel.
  3. Assuming the three upward-sloping lines are parallel, \(\frac25=\frac n{6.5}\), so \(n=2.6\). The diagram does not mark this parallelism.
  4. \(\frac23=\frac k8\), so \(k=\frac{16}{3}\).
  5. Intended parallel lines: \(BC\parallel ED\); then \(\triangle ABC\sim\triangle AED\) by AA. This parallelism is not given by markings, so the drawing alone does not prove it.
  6. Intended parallel lines: \(AB\parallel FG\parallel DE\); then \(\triangle CBA\sim\triangle CFG\sim\triangle CDE\) by AA. The photograph does not establish exact parallelism or collinearity; these must be assumed for the model.
  7. Intended parallel lines: \(GF\parallel IH\); then \(\triangle JFG\sim\triangle JHI\) by AA. Parallelism is not marked.
  8. Intended parallel lines: \(KI\parallel FJ\) and \(LH\parallel GJ\). With those assumptions, \(\triangle GKI\sim\triangle GFJ\sim\triangle LFH\) by AA. No extra similarity involving \(HI\) follows without an additional parallel-line given.

4. Set — Identify parallel segments and similar triangles

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Set · pp. 23–24 · Problems 11–14
Identify which segments are intended to be parallel, then write similarity statements with matching vertices in order.

For each diagram, work backward from matching angles: a transversal crossing parallel segments forms equal corresponding angles. Two equal angle pairs prove AA similarity. Name the triangles in a consistent order.

Worked example 10 — Read and write the triangle names.

In a triangle \(\triangle ABC\), points \(D\) and \(E\) lie on \(AB\) and \(AC\), respectively, and \(DE\parallel BC\).

Angle \(A\) is shared, angle \(D\) corresponds to angle \(B\), and angle \(E\) corresponds to angle \(C\). Thus

\[\boxed{\triangle ADE\sim\triangle ABC}.\]

Check the vertex order. Writing \(\triangle ADE\sim\triangle ACB\) would incorrectly pair \(D\) with \(C\).

Some packet drawings contain more than two similar triangles. Identify one parallel pair at a time, and begin each similarity statement with the same apex, where practical. For the photo in problem 12, use the overlaid lettered white lines as the intended geometric construction; visual parallelism in a perspective photo by itself is not a rigorous given.

Packet clarification — Set, problems 7, 9, and 11–14 (pp. 23–24).

Several figures use strokes that look parallel but do not explicitly mark or state every needed parallel relationship. A diagram’s appearance does not prove that lines are exactly parallel, so the indicated proportions and triangle similarities are not logically guaranteed by an unmarked drawing alone. These questions are evidently intended to assume the relevant near-parallel segments really are parallel. Treat that intended assumption as part of the problem, especially for the photographed example in problem 12.

5. Go review — Similar slope triangles always give the same slope

Study the worked examples first, then try the problems yourself. An answer key at the bottom of this section is provided to check your work.

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Go · p. 24 · Problems 15–18
Draw three right triangles of different sizes on each line, then compare signed rise/run ratios.

A line’s slope measures vertical change divided by horizontal change:

\[m=\frac{\text{rise}}{\text{run}}=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}.\]

A slope triangle consists of a horizontal run, a vertical rise (or fall), and the segment of the line joining their ends. Each such triangle is right-angled. Along one nonvertical straight line, these right triangles have the same acute angles, so they are similar. Their corresponding rises and runs scale equally, leaving the ratio unchanged.

Signs matter. Moving from left to right, an upward line has positive slope and a downward line has negative slope. A larger triangle changes rise and run by the same factor, so the slope remains the same. A horizontal line has slope 0; a vertical line has undefined slope because its run is 0.
02468101202468xy
Original graph: upward line. Small triangle: rise 1, run 2. Large triangle: rise 3, run 6. Both give \(m=\frac{1}{2}\).
02468101202468xy
Original graph: downward line. Small triangle: rise −2, run 3. Large triangle: rise −6, run 9. Both give \(m=-\frac{2}{3}\).
Go Problem A — Straightforward (original).

A line passes through \((1,2)\) and \((7,5)\). Draw (or imagine) two slope triangles, one with run 2 and one with run 6. What are their signed rises and slopes?

Step 1: From the two points, the total rise is \(5-2=3\) and the run is \(7-1=6\), so \(m=3/6=1/2\).

Step 2: A run of 2 is one-third of 6, so the rise must be 1. Its slope is \(1/2\).

Step 3: With run 6 and rise 3, the slope is again \(3/6=1/2\). Both triangles trace the same straight line.

Go Problem B — More challenging (original).

On a line sloping downward, a triangle with a horizontal run of 4 has a signed rise of −3. A larger triangle has a horizontal run of 12. Find its signed rise and both slopes.

Step 1: The small slope is \(m=-3/4\).

Step 2: The larger run is \(12/4=3\) times the small run. Similarity multiplies the rise by 3 as well: \(-3\cdot3=-9\).

Step 3: The large slope is \(-9/12=-3/4\), just like the small slope.

Common error: writing \(3/4\) drops the minus sign. A downward segment has a negative signed rise when you move right.

Go Problem C — A line given by points (original).

A line passes through \((-3,7)\) and \((6,1)\). Find its slope, then describe a second, smaller slope triangle with integer side changes.

\[m=\frac{1-7}{6-(-3)}=\frac{-6}{9}=-\frac23.\]

Reduce both signed changes by a factor of 3: a run of 3 and a fall of 2 forms a second slope triangle. Its slope is \(-2/3\).

Check your work — Go 15–18 answer key
  1. Using equal horizontal and vertical grid units, slope \(\frac12\); rise/run examples \(\frac12=\frac24=\frac36\). Plot/construction not shown.
  2. Using equal grid units, slope \(3\); examples \(\frac31=\frac62=\frac93\). Plot/construction not shown.
  3. Using equal grid units, slope \(-\frac14\); examples \(\frac{-1}{4}=\frac{-2}{8}=\frac{-3}{12}\). Plot/construction not shown.
  4. Using equal grid units, slope \(-\frac32\); examples \(\frac{-3}{2}=\frac{-6}{4}=\frac{-9}{6}\). Plot/construction not shown.

Additional Learning Resources

In your MVP packetSection 6.4 · Main task, Ready, Set, and Go · pp. 20–24
Optional explanations and practice chosen to reinforce this day’s material.
Resource and direct linkWhat it covers / why use itScope / What to skip
Khan Academy — Proof: Parallel lines divide triangle sides proportionallyWorked proof closely matching the difference-of-segments argument in the main task.Close match. The full proof is suitable for Main 4–6.
Khan Academy — Applying the triangle proportionality theoremA practical example of multiple parallel lines crossing roads, much like Set 7–10.Close match. Watch the example involving intersecting parallel roads; no trigonometry is needed.
Paul’s Online Math Notes — Algebra, 3.2: LinesWritten reference with worked examples for slope, signed rise/run, and the two-point slope formula (Go 15–18).Some extra material. Focus on the opening slope definition and initial worked slope examples; skip later point-slope and perpendicular-line equations for today.
Paul’s Online Math Notes — Lines practice problemsExtra practice for computing the slope from pairs of points, with worked solution links.Some extra material. Try problems 1–2 on slope; later equation-writing and line-classification problems are outside today’s focus.
Khan Academy — Proving slope is constant using similarityA fuller geometric explanation of why every slope triangle on a line has the same rise/run.Close match. Optional deeper proof for Go 15–18.

The resource links require an internet connection. The lesson text and diagrams work offline; mathematical typesetting requires an internet connection. No closely matched Professor Leonard lecture on this specific theorem was confirmed, so no broader lecture is assigned.

Teacher review — Substantive packet issues

1. Parallelism is essential but inconsistently specified in the Set figures (7, 9, 11–14; pp. 23–24). Some intended parallel lines are not explicitly identified by arrow marks or statements. Without parallelism, the conclusions of similar triangles and proportional segments do not follow. Suggested correction: state the relevant pairs of parallel lines as given, especially for the real-world photograph in question 12.

No further serious mathematical errors or ambiguities were identified. The main task uses approximate measurement as an intermediate check and then explicitly requests an algebraic proof; that sequence is not itself a mathematical error.

Section 6.4 packet-to-lesson coverage

Packet assignmentExpected skillWhere it is taught
Main 1–3 · p. 20AA similarity of triangles made by parallel lines; correct proportionality statements with three nested trianglesIn class
Main 4–6 and proof · p. 21Proportional segments lying between parallels; numerical check and general algebraic proofIn class
Ready 1–4 · p. 22Pythagorean theorem, unknown leg or hypotenuse, radicalsSection 2
Ready 5–6 · p. 22Set up proportions from similar right triangles; match sides and solveSection 2
Set 7–8 · p. 23Find matching segments and write three equal ratiosSection 3
Set 9–10 · p. 23Solve for unknown portions cut off by parallel linesSection 3
Set 11–12 · p. 23; 13–14 · p. 24Find parallel pairs; write similarly ordered triangle namesSection 4
Go 15–18 · p. 24Different-sized right slope triangles, signed rise/run, same slopeSection 5

All illustrations and worked numerical examples are newly created; they are not measurements of the MVP packet’s printed drawings. This lesson stops with proportions from parallel lines and slope triangles; the applications and more involved angle problems of Section 6.5 are not introduced.

Last updated .